Catholics MUST Fight Transgenderism…

 

Challenging the party line on Transgenderism puts doctors’ careers in jeopardy…
It has already happened to scientists who challenge the scientific theory of Climate change. They are maligned and called Climate deniers. Some even have their jobs threatened. Now Doctors who challenge unscientific Transgender politics are having the same kinds of dirty techniques used to try to silence them.  Source

Comment:

Compare the facts in the above report to the propaganda that is being thrown at us day in and day out on our TV screens and in newspapers. There’s NO science behind this stupidity.  Learn some of those facts by heart and use them to fight this scandalous propaganda. No Catholic can support this scandal OR be silent as it spreads like wildfire. Such silence makes us complicit in grave sin.  Click here to read an excellent article by a Catholic woman published in The Universe. More Catholics need to show a lead here: writing letters to support those, like Caroline Farrow, who speak out is one worthy apostolate that costs no more than a postage stamp or the few minutes that it takes to write an email – click here.

Already we are seeing Catholics, including priests and teachers, going along with this nutty idea that men can become women and women can become men. Crazy.  Click here to read the comments section in our recent blog on Fatima and the Vision of Hell, where we discuss the shocking news of the complicity of Archbishop Peter Smith in the promotion of LGBT issues in his schools in Southwark, specifically the introduction of a “gender neutral” uniform in St Anthony’s Catholic Primary school – no replies to any of our emails and phone calls from any of the parties responsible up to and including the archbishop himself. Then there’s  the scandal of St Mary’s Primary in the same archdiocese, inviting the militant LGBT group Stonewall in to conduct “workshops” with pupils.   Child abuse, writ large. 

Which brings me to our central topic for discussion…

Bottom Line: Transition-Affirming Protocol Is Child Abuse

…These professionals are using the myth that people are born transgender to justify engaging in massive, uncontrolled, and unconsented experimentation on children who have a psychological condition that would otherwise resolve after puberty in the vast majority of cases.

…These harms constitute nothing less than institutionalized child abuse. Sound ethics demand an immediate end to the use of pubertal suppression, cross-sex hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries in children and adolescents, as well as an end to promoting gender ideology via school curricula and legislative policies.

It is time for our nation’s leaders and the silent majority of health professionals to learn exactly what is happening to our children, and unite to take action.   End of Extract…

“Transition-Affirming Protocol Is Child Abuse”…

I agree, wholeheartedly – do you?  

“Gays” In UK Government Forcing Their Agenda on Children As Young as Four

From Sky News…

An investigation in the Times newspaper last year revealed that tens of thousands of schoolchildren had been caught sharing sexual imagery.

Children as young as 12 had sent topless pictures to their peers, while one in 10 pupils had “sexted” a “non-school adult”, Freedom of Information data from 50 schools revealed.  Read more

It is against this background, that the Government, led by Education Secretary, Justine Greening, the first openly “gay” woman in the Conservative cabinet,  has announced its intention to introduce four year old children to “relationships” education. And we all know what that means, if you wish to avoid being labelled “homophobic”.   

justinegreenertwitterannouncement

Now, if the Education Secretary were a traditional Catholic, introducing compulsory teaching about traditional marriage and virtues such as chastity and purity, whether for four year olds or fourteen year olds, there would be an outcry (no pun intended) and the cry would be to the effect that religious beliefs should not drive Government policy and teachers should not be forced to be prescriptive and so on and so forth.  The sheer hypocrisy of it all is breathtaking.

Key question: should “gays” be permitted to continue to enforce their ideology in school classrooms north and south of the border – because, while this latest announcement refers to England, take it as read that the same ideology will soon come to Scotland, that, if it is not already here, it soon will be –  it’ll be the norm, north and south of the border, before you’ve had time to say “Justine Greening’s out!” 

So far, not a single Bishop has called time on this state sanctioned child sex abuse, nor called attention to the hypocrisy of decrying religious beliefs and the natural moral law as a basis for teaching right behaviour and attitudes, whilst permitting the LGBT etc  lobby to run the show, despite the fact that, in the latest release from the Office of National Statistics, only a tiny minority of the population identify as LGBT etc: In 2015, the majority (93.7%) of the UK population identified themselves as heterosexual or straight, with 1.7% identifying as LGB, the remainder either identifying as “other”, “don’t know” or refusing to respond. Young adults (16 to 24 year olds) are more likely to identify as LGB compared with older age groups, and a higher proportion of males identify as LGB than females.”

Clearly, it should come as no surprise that the LGBT goal is to “get them young” – and it is shocking that churchmen are keeping silent at this time, when even small toddlers as young as four are being targeted for the purpose of brainwashing them with LGBT etc propaganda. They’ll be taught that it is OK to have two daddies, two mummies, or decide to be “trans” – there won’t be any warnings at all about the dangers inherent in the whole LGBT etc experiment.   Click here for some facts about the homosexual etc “lifestyle”

What, if anything, can be done about the undue influence exercised by the LGBT etc minority, in classrooms UK-wide?  Is there a Catholic teacher or priest anywhere in the land who is refusing to go along with this scandal?

Comments invited…