That light-hearted response to the threat to conquer Rome contrasts with the reaction here
The following extracts are taken from How the 1571 Battle of Lepanto saved Europe…
For those who know little history, today’s battle with the Islamic State in the Middle East may seem new and unprecedented. It is not.
In a.d. 622, Mohammed set out from Medina to conquer the whole Christian world for Allah by force of arms. Within a hundred years, his successors had occupied and pillaged every Christian capital of the Middle East, from Antioch through North Africa (home of Saint Augustine) and Spain. All that remained outside Allah’s reign was the northern arc from Southern France to Constantinople…
Even today, in the eyes of political Islamists, the expansion of Islam is far from finished. The dynamic obligation at the heart of their Islam is to conquer the world for Allah, and to incorporate it all into the great Islamic Umma. Only then will the world be at peace. Submission to Allah is the reason the world was created…
The Greatest Sea Battle in History: Lepanto, October 1571
For more than three years, Pope Pius V had labored mightily to sound alarms about the deadly Muslim buildup in the shipyards of Istanbul. The sultan had been stung by the surprising defeat of his overwhelming invasion force in Malta in 1565. The savagery of Muslim attacks on the coastal villages of Italy, Sicily, Dalmatia, and Greece was ratcheted upwards. Three or four Muslim galleys would offload hundreds of marines, who would sweep through a village, tie all its healthy men together for shipment out to become galley slaves, march away many of its women and young boys and girls for shipment to Eastern harems, and then gather all the elderly into the village church, where the helpless victims would be beheaded, and sometimes cut up into little pieces, to strike terror into other villages. The Muslims believed that future victims would lose heart and swiftly surrender when Muslim raiders arrived. Over three centuries, the number of European captives kidnapped from villages and beaches by these pirates climbed into the hundreds of thousands.
The reason for this kidnapping was that the naval appetite for fresh backs and muscles was insatiable. Most galley slaves lived little more than five years. They were chained to hard benches in the burning Mediterranean sun, slippery in their own excrement, urine, and intermittent vomiting, often never lying down to sleep. The dark vision that troubled the pope during the late 1560s was of even more horrible calamities to befall the whole Christian world, bit by bit. But unity in Europe was hard to find, and even more scarce was the will to fight for survival.
There is no point here in giving the whole narrative of the battle. Suffice it to say that in the center, the volleys from the galleasses out in front destroyed one Muslim vessel after another. ..
As news of the great victory of October 7 reached shore, church bells rang all over the cities and countryside of Europe. For months, Pius V had urged Catholics to say the daily rosary on behalf of the morale and good fortune of the Christian forces and, above all, for a successful outcome to the highly risky preemptive strike against the Turkish fleets. Thereafter, he declared that October 7 would be celebrated as the Feast of “Mary, Queen of Victory.” A later Pope added the title “Queen of the Most Holy Rosary” in honor of the laity’s favorite form of prayer. All over the Italian peninsula, great paintings were commissioned — whole galleries were dedicated — to honor the classic scenes of that epic battle. The air of Europe that October tasted of liberties preserved. The record of the celebrations lives on in glorious paintings by Titian, Tintoretto, and many others. Click here to read How the 1571 Battle of Lepanto saved Europe
It is a well established fact that Our Lady won the Battle of Lepanto for the Christian armies, and so maybe it’s time to redouble our prayers, take Our Lady at her word and trust totally in the power of the Rosary to defeat heresies, and time, too, for us to remember the words of the Fatima seer, Sister Lucia, that there is no problem, whether temporal or spiritual that cannot be overcome by the power of the Rosary. That’s quite a promise.
So we learn plenty about the power of the rosary; Is there anything else to learn from the Battle of Lepanto in the context of the contemporary threat from Islamist terrorism? Are we, for example, praying sufficiently for the conversion of Muslims?
I walked into my living room this morning, just as the journalist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown was saying: “The problem is, Catholicism is making women have babies.”
I immediately rang Sky to lodge a complaint about this blatant bias, and then emailed email@example.com as follows:
I was appalled to hear the journalist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown on the All Out Politics Show on Sky this morning, remark that “…The problem is, Catholicism is making women have babies.” (then laugh.) Nasty woman.
Were I to dare to make a similar nasty remark about Islam (her religion, I believe) I would face a visit from my local police – no doubt about it. Can you imagine the outcry if I, or anyone else, were to say “the problem is, Islam is making these people into terrorists”?
There is one rule for Islam and another rule for the rest of us, notably the Catholic Church.
I will be posting this email on the Catholic Truth blog shortly, because I doubt very much if any publicity, let alone an apology, will be forthcoming from Sky, so I will do what is within my limited power to publicize the unconscionable anti-Catholic bias of Sky.
If a comparable comment were made on air about Islam – “the peaceful religion” – to the effect that “Islam is causing people to become terrorists” all Hell would break loose, so should, in your opinion, Sky News apologise for this scandal – and should Yasmin Alibhai-Brown be dropped as a political commentator on their programme(s)?
I will, of course, seek an email address in order to send Yasmin Alibhai-Brown a link to this thread. She comes across as a tad arrogant, in my opinion, so I doubt if she will give a toss, but in the interests of fairness, I feel obliged to offer her the opportunity to exercise her right to reply. Just don’t hold your breath, not least because it’s never easy to defend the indefensible and an apology is, to say the least, highly unlikely unless it is in the category of “I’m sorry if I offended you… “ Not acceptable. We require an apology for lying about the Catholic Church and insulting every Catholic woman on the planet – that’s what we are looking for – nothing less. So, as I say, don’t hold your breath.
Father Mark Higgins, a priest in the Archdiocese of Southwark, whose beautiful sermons on YouTube, preached at events organised by a group called Day With Mary (DWM) and featured on this blog in the past, has now been dropped by the group for a sermon which they consider to be “a direct attack upon Islam”. Here’s an extract from their email to Father: “You were invited to give two sermons on Our Lady, which you kindly accepted to do. Your second sermon however, contained much that was a direct attack upon Islam and contained highly imprudent expressions. This was all done in a way that would most likely have generated adverse reactions, not only against yourself and the Catholic Church, but would also have put at risk the personal safety (even lives) of other Catholics and clergy, as well as DWM members and churches we frequent. I am sure you can understand the risk your sermon could place many people in, if you are up to date with current news in this country and elsewhere…”
This is a very troubling email, given that it comes from a layperson representing a group with some kind of official standing in the archdiocese; the group has elected to rebuke a young priest – for what? For preaching the Faith – no more, no less. That’s troubling. It’s also troubling that the DWM group thinks nothing of assuming that all Muslims are extremists, ready to take offence at the perfectly understandable desire of a Catholic priest to win their souls for Christ. Is it not much more offensive to implicitly suggest that the dogma outside the Church, no salvation should be kept hidden from Muslims, because they cannot be trusted to reject it without resorting to terrorist violence? This is manifestly the fear of the DWM group.
Well, let’s read the text of Father Higgins’ talk, and draw our own conclusions as to whether it represents “A direct attack upon Islam”. It’s certainly true that there are those in high places today who have opted out of preaching Christ and seeking converts to the Faith, in order to avoid “offending” non-Catholics, but since it’s not an attitude supported in either Sacred Scripture or Catholic Tradition, it seems to me to be entirely at odds with the Christian imperative, straight from the lips of Our Lord Himself: “Going, therefore, teach ye all nations: baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost.” (Matthew 28:19)
Text of Talk: Virgin Mary leading Muslims to Christ – Fr Mark Higgins
Back in the 1950s Archbishop Sheen wrote a book on Our Mother Mary entitled, The World’s First Love; whilst very few people have read the entire book, one chapter in particular stands out – Chapter 17, Mary and the Muslims. He tries to make the point that the Virgin Mary has a special place in the plan of Almighty God in bringing about the conversion of the Muslims.
I think some heretical Catholics these days act as if the Muslims don’t need to be converted, but if we take the bible seriously, and the teachings of the Church seriously, we can only reach one conclusion- without Christ, the Muslims are not going to make it to heaven.
My brothers and sisters, here in London, you have Muslims all around you; what a blessed opportunity God is giving you to bring them salvation, through bringing them the truth about the saviour Jesus Christ and the one Holy Catholic Church He founded.
Thank God that many people in our city are making efforts to bring the saving message of Christianity to these unfortunate Muslims, but from what I can see, there has yet to be a torrent of conversions; there are certainly some, there have been some in this parish, there were some in my last parish, but the floodgates are yet to open. But I promise you, the floodgates will open, and a vast number of Muslims will be converted, but this will only happen when we get with [the] plan of Almighty God, and His plan, as archbishop Fulton sheen realised, was for those Muslims to be brought to Christ, through the means of His blessed and Holy Mother Mary.
Archbishop Sheen hadn’t come up with something new here, you can hear it whispered in Catholic prophecy, you see it mentioned in the writings of the saints and the mystics.
Many of them knew from the intimacies of prayer that, as the world draws to a close, as God begins to prepare the world for the return of His son, there will be an age of special devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary. And that during this age of Mary, many of the followers of Islam will abandon their false religion and embrace the only saviour Jesus Christ.
St. Louis De- Montfort writes “The power of Mary over all devils will be particularly outstanding in the last age of the world. At that time Mary will extend the Kingdom of Christ even over the Muslims,
The history of our religion encourages us to anticipate the miraculous.
No one would have expected the mass conversion of the pagan Mexicans to the one true faith, no missionary would have dared foretell it in 1530, and yet within the few decades that followed 15 million Mexicans embraced the true faith.
How did this happen?
It was through our Blessed Mother, appearing to St . Juan Diego, and miraculously imprinting her image on his tilma. Her image fascinated the Mexicans and made them realise that she was the mother of the true God, the God who crushes the head of their serpent God and stands on top of the moon, his symbol.
Towards the close of the last century we began to see heavenly signs that God was following a similar plan for the Muslims, we saw this in a number of mass apparitions that took place in Egypt- such as those in Assuit, Zeitoun, and Omrania. In each of these apparitions the Virgin Mary appeared on top of a Church on successive evenings, she stood there, crowned with twelve stars, she stood there, holding her son, her son, who was the source of the light that enveloped her. She was presenting her son to the Muslims of Egypt, her son, who is the source of all her titles and honours and glories.
You see that is the unusual thing about the Virgin Mary in Islam, her role is really bigged up, but bigged up for what? The Koranic view of Mary is an almighty anti-climax.
She is the only woman in the Koran to even get named, she is spoken of in Surah 3. as “chosen above the women of all nations”, in Surah 19 as alone bearing a son and remaining a virgin, and in Surah 3 as being fed by the holy angels as a child.
And for what reason? To give birth to a prophet?
It simply doesn’t add up, because the Mohammed seem to think there had been 124,000 prophets, why would this one, the prophet for the Jewish people have such an extraordinary mother? With titles and dignities that stand as an anomaly in Islamic theology.
O Muslims, consider the grandeur of the Blessed Virgin, even according to your own book and you will discover that she must be so much more than the mother of some prophet.
O Muslims, look towards the Taurat and the Injil and you will discover why the Virgin Mary is so highly praised, you will discover the truth about her mission and the mission of her son.
O Muslims, Listen to the prophecy of Isaiah 7 made 500 years before the Virgin Mary’s birth, He writes “The Lord Himself will give you a sign: behold a Virgin will conceive and bear a son, and shall call His name Immanuel, a name which means God is with us.”
Can you see, the Virgin is great because her son is the greatest. The Virgin is graced because her son is the author of grace, the virgin is untouched by men, because she is the ark of the covenant, the place reserved for God Himself.
My friends, we shouldn’t just stand waiting idly for the Lord to reach the Muslims through some extraordinary wonder, because we don’t know when the Lord will act; instead, we should be arming ourselves with reasons for our Holy Faith and explanations to offer the Muslims on the truths of Christianity.
So often Muslims are the ones taking the initiative to try and lead us into their heresies and deceptions, but truly we have the words that they are waiting for, the message that will set them free from the bondage of the law and of trying to please their God through ticking the boxes of Sharia.
In your conversations with Muslims, do not be afraid to start off by talking about the Blessed Mother- talk about her apparitions, her many apparitions, agree with them that Mary is ever Virgin and untouched by Satan’s grasp, but let them know that all this was prophesied in the Christian scriptures, and prophesied right next to verses that declare that she will give birth to God clothed in human nature, to the saviour of the world.
Show them the Book of Genesis in which God so masterfully reveals to Satan how He will be crushed by a woman, by a woman and her seed, by Jesus Christ through His holy mother Mary.
In all of their needs and worries, encourage them to seek the Virgin Mary’s intercession, I have personally known of Muslims to receive great graces through Mary, and often these graces becomes signals to them, signs to them of the insufficiency of their religion and of their need to get to know about the real Mary, and the real Jesus.
It is true, the Koran does talk about Jesus Christ, but the Jesus in the Koran is a fabrication. If you read the words of the Jesus of the Koran you don’t meet a person, you just discover some guy who goes around saying “I am not God, worship the one God”, you don’t find the person of Jesus Christ in the Koran, you don’t find the Jesus who meets people, who touches their lives, who slowly reveals His divinity and offers reconciliation with God through a personal relationship with Him.
No, the Jesus of the Koran is a 2d figure, simply a mouthpiece of Islam. A cardboard cut out of Islam. And surely, if the real Jesus had been as the Koran depicts Him, there could have never been any Christianity, because the false Jesus of Islam leaves no room for thinking he is anything more than some regular guy.
The Jesus of the Koran isn’t the real Jesus, He doesn’t even have the name Jesus, He is called Isa, a name which means nothing at all, whereas the name Jesus means saviour, the true Jesus is the saviour, that’s why God gives Him that name through the archangel Gabriel- you must name Him Jesus, because He will save the people from their sins.
Salvation comes through Jesus Christ alone, the redeemer, the Word of God who took a human nature to Himself and offered a sacrifice to counter-balance the sins of the world.
That Jesus Christ came into the world through the Virgin Mary, and He continues to come to the world through her intercession, He is continually the fruit of her holy womb,
Almighty God has so willed it, He has willed that the Virgin Mary give birth to the entire Christ, to the head and also His members, through the power of God the Holy Spirit.
O Virgin Mary, we beg you, complete the task that the Almighty has given you, bring your son, the only saviour to all peoples who do not know Him. And help us O blessed Virgin Mary, to be ambassadors for your son,
Help us to have your gentleness, and your sweetness and your patience as we seek to evangelise the Muslims, give us the words that will touch their hearts, help us to lead them to consider your dignity and your holiness, so that admiring you they may be brought to the saviour, and to find salvation, in the One Holy Catholic Church He founded.
I fail to see any “attack” upon Islam in Father’s talk, which was delivered in Woolwich last summer but considered unsuitable for publication online by Day With Mary staff fearful of offending Muslims and (more to the point) terrified of putting themselves at risk in some way. I can’t see any reasonable Muslim taking offence – they know that Christianity is, by its very nature, missionary, and since they seek converts themselves, they can hardly object to Catholics obeying Christ’s instruction to do the same, right to the ends of the earth.
After an appearance on a TV discussion show, I was contacted by a Muslim who – in the friendliest manner – entered into an extended theological debate with me, with no animosity whatsoever – topic…that one religion is not as good as another! It emerged during our email exchanges that he had been surprised at my remarks on TV simply because his “liberal” Catholic friends had led him to believe that the Church taught equality of the “Abrahamic” religions. At no time did I feel under threat for explaining the true teaching of the Church, which he soon came to recognise as quite contrary to the liberal version he had been given.
One commentator hit the nail on the head with this description of the DWM group: “Day with Mary spouts a pietist Catholicism-lite which is afraid to challenge modernist doctrines and is unwilling to evangelise Muslims.” Sounds about right to me. I say, enough of such cowardice in the name of a false prudence. What do you say? Share your thoughts.
But not yet. Firstly, consider this: far from “attacking” Islam, Father Higgins has shown true love and compassion towards Muslims, by wishing to bring them to Christ. He knows that, to quote Pope Leo XIII, this can only be done through Our Lady:
Every grace which is communicated to this world has a threefold origin: it flows from God to Christ, from Christ to the Virgin, and from the Virgin to us . . . Nothing comes to us except through the mediation of Mary, for such is the will of God. Thus, just as no man goes to the Father but by the Son, so likewise no one goes to Christ except through His Mother. Whosoever will not have recourse to her is trying to fly without wings . . . O Virgin Most Holy, no one abounds in the knowledge of God except through thee; no one, O Mother of God, attains salvation except through thee!
Now, why on earth would any Catholic keep that beautiful truth from our Muslim brothers and sisters? Whatever happened to their Confirmation graces, the character of the Sacrament of Confirmation which makes us Soldiers of Christ. Any coward is unattractive – but a cowardly soldier?
“Terror is nothing more than speedy, severe and inflexible justice; it is thus an emanation of virtue; it is less a principle in itself, than a consequence of the general principle of democracy, applied to the most pressing needs of the patrie.” – Maximilien Robespierre, 1794
The Rage of the Left and the Coming Terror
In 1989, France marked the 200th anniversary of the French Revolution. It was a strained celebration, for even its most ardent apologists were compelled to admit the bloody and sordid nature of much that the Revolution encompassed. The guillotine remains its most enduring symbol.
In 1989, Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev went to Paris to participate in the bicentennial celebration and said, “The spirit of the French Revolution has always been present in the social life of our country.” As columnist Charles Krauthammer then observed: “Few attempts at ingratiation have been more true or more damning.”
The bloodbath and horrors of communism have much in common with the bloodbath and horrors of what is now called “The Terror.” The Bolsheviks and the French Revolutionaries both relied on political assassination, domestic spying, denunciations and imprisonments, show trials and the criminalization of all dissent. Both terrorized the populace while committing their crimes in the name of “the People.” Tyrants always claim a democratic mandate.
The French Revolution’s Committee for Public Safety condemned to death almost 17,000 people in one year. (See: “Reign of Terror”.) This is a negligible body count when laid against the tens of millions that have been sacrificed on the altar of communism. We prefer to think that men such as Robespierre and Stalin are creatures of bygone eras and that conditions no longer allow for such horrors to be perpetrated. Perhaps, we should think again.
The Pope and the Antifa
Pope Francis has been called the new leader of the global Left. He has not demurred from the acclimation. He has been flatteringly featured in publications that can hardly be considered supportive of Catholic teaching, such as Rolling Stone. He has been praised by leaders of the pro-abortion movement, such as Hillary Clinton. Those who favor unrestricted Muslim immigration in the West and open borders feel they have a friend in Francis, and they are seldom disappointed.
Francis denounces “populism” as dangerous and fascistic whenever he disagrees with the “people.” Otherwise, he defends popular fashions in morals and ideology, often opposing the “living” reality of the times to the outmoded intransigence of traditional doctrine. He is with you so long as you are with him. We have never had a Pope who is so divorced from the normal exercise of his office and so eager for the approbation of the ruling classes, that is, the globalist Left. (See: “For 2017 More of the Same: Leftist Politics Wrapped in the Language of Catholic Piety”.)
Meanwhile, the Left with which the Pope has aligned himself has suffered some setbacks, and it is not taking them well. Donald Trump has won the presidency of the United States; a “conservative” has been appointed to the Supreme Court. The unholy alliance of the “deep state” with its political masters is being exposed. The intelligence community is now known to be corrupt and untrustworthy. Democrats still control the media, but are hemorrhaging popular support. They appear more and more like generals without an army.
In Europe, the United Kingdom is leaving the European Union. French nationalism is rising. Poland and Hungary are resisting Muslim immigration. And the narrative of current events is no longer tightly controlled by the propaganda arm of globalism — that is, the major news outlets — but is coming into public view, in factual and unedited form, from a growing number of information sites via the Web.
The Left has not, until recently, been called upon to defend itself. The ruling elites were protected from hard questioning by a supportive media that vilified anyone who subjected their positions to scrutiny. The media, like the Pope, resorts to the ad hominem attack as a matter of course. But their credibility is greatly diminished and the media’s fairness and accuracy are now being subjected to a scrutiny they have never before had to face. The control of the Left, which appeared so formidable for so long, is now unravelling.
The late John Vennari once memorably said that logic and liberalism cannot co-exist in the same head. Traced to its principle, a liberal position tends to fall apart from lack of coherence, internal contradiction or a collision with obvious facts. That Islam is a “Religion of Peace” is an example of a patently absurd liberal position; yet, every globalist, from George Bush to Angela Merkel to Pope Francis, has repeated this absurdity with the apparent expectation that it will be believed — or that people will fear to contradict the claim because the media will discredit and destroy anyone who dissents. (See: “America Magazine Frets over Catholics’ Lack of Love for Islam”.) Facts, for the Left, are irrelevant. It is the narrative that is important, and the narrative can be shaped to suit the needs of the moment.
The Left is demonic in that its position is that of Lucifer: it wants to usurp the prerogatives of the Creator and refashion the world according to its likes and dislikes. It reverses Our Lord’s prayer in the Garden of Gethsemane and says, “Not Thy will, but mine be done.” And it uses whatever tool is at hand to smash the natural order that stands in its way. Muslim immigration is just a tool for smashing what remains of European Christian culture. Transgenderism is a tool for smashing what remains of traditional sexual morality. Entitlement programs are a tool for smashing what remains of personal self-reliance. And all of this destruction is done in the name of compassion, of mercy. To oppose globalism is to be mean, bigoted, un-Christian. (See: “Pope Francis Suggests Donald Trump Is ‘Not Christian’”.) It is to build walls instead of bridges. It is to invite finger wagging and invective from the Pope.
And while the Pope is vilifying the Left’s opponents daily at the Casa Santa Marta, mobs of masked “protesters” are appearing in cities across America and Europe. They are called the Antifa – for anti-fascists. It is a bit of Orwellian Newspeak from the Left’s Ministry of Truth. The Antifa disguise their faces, shout obscenities, beat people up, hurl trash cans through windows, set cars on fire, block traffic and shout down anyone who would say anything with which they disagree. They oppose free speech, freedom of assembly for any group they dislike, and are prepared to use violence if they don’t get what they want. The Antifa are, in short, fascists. (See: “What is ‘Antifa’? And why is the media so reluctant to expose it?”.)
In Berkeley, they enjoy the protection of the University administration, the mayor and the police. (See: “WOW! BERKELEY MAYOR Who Allegedly Told Police To ‘Stand Down’ Is Part Of Antifa Terrorist Facebook Group”.) We are asked to believe that the police force is no match for this rabble and therefore cannot guarantee the physical safety of conservative speakers, such as Ann Coulter. How stupid does the Left think the public is? There is collusion on a growing scale between the Left, the street mobs they incite and direct and the parts of the government they still control. That the Left is turning to orchestrated violence is a sign of things to come. If they cannot succeed through electoral politics, they will try to assert their will through social disruption, through fear, and then blame the chaos and bloodshed on the victims, the so-called fascists who had to be opposed for the sake of freedom and justice.
Just how far will the Left go to regain the power they have temporarily lost? This remains to be seen. One thing is apparent, however: civil discourse is no longer on the table. This is a struggle for raw power in which every outrage against decency is being justified in the name of “saving our democracy.” Network television programs now feature obscene rants against Trump and Republicans as a matter of course. The foulest language and fiercest hatred is countenanced as “entertainment.” It appears probable that the situation will only grow worse, for recent history shows that once the bar of decency has been lowered, it is never raised again. We can only descend at this point to ever more repulsive and brutish behavior on the part of the media in support of the Left.
The Long View and What We Can Expect
There is a professor in Berkeley named George Lakoff. He specializes in something called “cognitive linguistics.” Lakoff has long aspired to a role in politics, having offered his services to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. He is now counseling the Left on how it should regroup in light of the Trump victory. What he urges is what he calls “framing” the debate through the use of metaphors — that is, inventing appealing names for repellent things. (See: “Moral Politics (book)”.)
His premise is that of the elite class: most people are too stupid to know what is in their best interest. The direction of their lives is best left in the hands of their intellectual and moral superiors, i.e. Lakoff and the Left. Hobbled by a nominal democracy, however, the smart people are compelled to manipulate the obtuse proletariat. Lakoff says this can best be done by using words that bypass reason and reach the unconscious, for reason is wasted on the masses. (See: “The Framing Wars”.)
Conservatives supposedly believe in what Lakoff calls the “Strict Father” model of the family, which he describes as authoritarian and cruel; it is opposed to the goodness and light of what he calls the “nurturant parent” model, favored by the benevolent Left. Lakoff wants the Left to use language to move people from the authoritarian model of the family to the nurturant parent model. But Lakoff’s strategy requires patience. It is also seen by some on the Left as academic theorizing that may or may not hold good in the real world. Meanwhile, the Left is opting for the fascism of the Antifa. It is trying to shut down the opposition through suppressing free speech. But Lakoff’s approach may also be tried.
Lakoff wants Democrats to stop using terms such as “federal regulations” and to talk instead about “protections.” He suggests the word “taxes” be replaced by the word “investments.” The media is always amenable to offering what help it can to “progressives,” for whom Lakoff is a self-appointed strategist, so we are likely to hear more linguistic legerdemain in the near future. The Associated Press Style Book has long used its power to push the Left’s agenda. The AP forbids the use of “pro-life” and “pro-abortion,” allowing only the term “pro-choice.” Most every newspaper and news outlet uses the AP as its usage guide. The media are likely to become the linguistic arm of the Antifa.
We should be alert to the fact that the Left is regrouping and a new language is being invented for presenting its agenda. Meanwhile, we can expect the street violence and the media assault against Trump to continue unabated. The public may tire of the turmoil and decide that Trump is too divisive a figure, a claim which the media will amplify in every way as the next election cycle approaches. If and when the Left manages to defeat its opposition, it will exercise power with an unprecedented ruthlessness. It has already discarded civil discourse and adopted the position that anyone who opposes them does not deserve a hearing, as their opponents are presumed to be motivated by racism, sexism, homophobia, xenophobia, religious bigotry and consummate evil and stupidity of every description.
Their opponents are deemed hateful, and why should hateful people be given any quarter? Why should such deplorables be allowed to speak, or even exist? The brigades of the Antifa will be let loose, aided by all the apparatus of the government and media. The spirit of Robespierre, the patron saint of the Left, will be triumphant. How bloody will it get? It is beyond present imagination, for we find it difficult to accept possibilities that are deeply repugnant to us. But we have history as a guide.
All of the above takes into account only the human factors that shape events. There is the overarching power of Providence that can intervene at any time in unforeseen ways. We have a Pope who has sided with the Left and is trying to convince, even compel, Catholics to support the globalist agenda. The doctrinal patrimony of the Catholic Church is endangered by Francis’ alliances. No human power can effectively oppose his politicization of the Faith. Where do we turn?
Our Lady of Fatima said, “Only I can help you.” Perhaps the time is coming when the whole world will realize the truth of Her words.
In conversation recently about Islam, I mentioned that once, during a public rosary, I noticed that when a veiled Muslim woman passed by she looked straight ahead, studiously ignoring our group.
The chat then turned on the fact that while Muslims are not afraid to show their religion by their dress, Catholics tend to keep any public displays of the Faith to a minimum, unless, like a public rosary event, we are together in a group.
Then, surprisingly, one person said that he always made the sign of the cross when he saw a Muslim, signs being very important and powerful, with, of course, the sign of the cross having a particular potency.
That got me thinking. Should more of us follow his brave example? Is there any other Catholic Action that you can think of, that falls into the category of “signs and symbols”? Or is this sort of thing liable to fall into the category of “Islamophobia”?
The Islamic State terror group has come out publicly to reject Pope Francis’ claims that the war being waged by Islamic terrorists is not religious in nature, assuring the pontiff that their sole motivation is religious and sanctioned by Allah in the Qur’an.
In the most recent issue of Dabiq, the propaganda magazine of the Islamic State, ISIS criticizes Pope Francis for his naïveté in clinging to the conviction that Muslims want peace and that acts of Islamic terror are economically motivated.
“This is a divinely-warranted war between the Muslim nation and the nations of disbelief,” the authors state in an article titled “By the Sword.”
The Islamic State directly attacks Francis for claiming that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Quran are opposed to every form of violence,” saying that by doing this, “Francis continues to hide behind a deceptive veil of ‘good will,’ covering his actual intentions of pacifying the Muslim nation.”
Pope Francis “has struggled against reality” in his efforts to portray Islam as a religion of peace, the article insists, before going on to urge all Muslims to take up the sword of jihad, the “greatest obligation” of a true Muslim.
Despite the obviously religious nature of their attacks, the article states, “many people in Crusader countries express shock and even disgust that Islamic State leadership ‘uses religion to justify violence.’”
“Indeed, waging jihad – spreading the rule of Allah by the sword – is an obligation found in the Quran, the word of our Lord,” it reads.
“The blood of the disbelievers is obligatory to spill by default. The command is clear. Kill the disbelievers, as Allah said, ‘Then kill the polytheists wherever you find them.’”
The Islamic State also reacted to Pope Francis’s description of recent acts of Islamic terror as “senseless violence,” insisting that there is nothing senseless about it.
“The gist of the matter is that there is indeed a rhyme to our terrorism, warfare, ruthlessness, and brutality,” they declare, adding that their hatred for the Christian West is absolute and implacable.
The fact is, even if you were to stop bombing us, imprisoning us, torturing us, vilifying us, and usurping our lands, we would continue to hate you because our primary reason for hating you will not cease to exist until you embrace Islam. Even if you were to pay jizyah [tax for infidels] and live under the authority of Islam in humiliation, we would continue to hate you.
In a recent press conference, Pope Francis told journalists that the world is at war. “But it’s a real war, not a religious war,” he said.
“It’s a war of interests, a war for money. A war for natural resources and for the dominion of the peoples.”
Click here to read Pope Francis’ remarks refusing to link the ISIS terrorist campaigns with Islam, while at the same time not pausing to draw breath before accusing Catholics of violence. With a “friend” like this, who needs enemies?
So, what do we have here? Let’s see: ISIS is angry that Pope Francis insists on describing their religion as a religion of peace, while Catholics like myself are incensed at being insulted by a Pope who thinks we’re as guilty of violent behaviour as any terrorist, when what he is really describing are the sins and crimes committed by individual Catholics for their own reasons, nothing to do with the Faith. He’s living proof that you just can’t please all of the people all of the time, or even some of the people some of the time – and, as they’ve now spelt out to him in words of one syllable, he’s just never going to please ISIS – so let’s hope he gives up playing at being a diplomat and starts preaching the truths of the Catholic Faith, because that is the ONLY raison d’être for his office.
I would suggest that if Papa Francis wants to be a negotiating diplomat for ISIS, then he ought to resign and apply for the job but it’s clear now that the ISIS assessment of Pope Francis is among the growing body of opinion that, to quote ISIS, Pope Francis is out of touch with reality. To put it mildly.
The first Islamic decapitation on western European soil since the times of the Battle of Vienna (1683) took place on June 26,2015, while the “champion” of the West, Barack Obama, was triumphantly celebrating the legalization of homosexual “marriages” imposed on all the States of the Union by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Exactly twenty years before, on June 21, 1995, the Islamic Mosque in Rome was officially inaugurated – the biggest in Europe, presented as a centre for ecumenical dialogue and religious peace. The only voice of protest heard in Italy at that time was the one of the Lepanto Cultural Centre, which promoted a Rosary of reparation in the church of St. Luigi Gonzaga, right next to the mosque, defining the construction of the Islamic centre in the heart of Rome as “a symbolic act of unspeakable gravity. Rome is the centre of the Catholic Faith: Islam at its very roots, denies the fundamental truths of our faith and intends to implant its dominion on the ruins that was once western Christian Civilization.”
During that same period, between 1992 and 1995, the ethnic and religious war was going on in Bosnia, the first “mediatic-war” of modern times, but also the most distorted by the media. The politically correct version of the conflict, presented the image of a prevalently Muslim government, but in actual fact – multicultural, besieged by radical nationalists, the Croatians and Serbians, determined to annihilate the Muslims in Bosnia. The truth ignored was that Bosnia was al-Qa’ida’s first global Jihad front and the first international event from which Islam gained enormous benefits.
John R. Schindler, an American analyst who spent almost a decade in the Balcan area, did a penetrating analysis on that war (Unholy Terror: Bosnia, Al-Qa’ida, and the Rise of Global Jihad, Zenith Press, St Paul, Minnesota 2007), which on many points coincided with those of Alexandre Del Valle, the geopolitical scholar, (Guerres contre l’Europe, Edition des Syrtes, Paris 2000). It was in Bosnia during the 1990s, that al-Qaeda, became the multinational of the Jihad under the leadership of Osama Bin Laden and his mujaheddin. Saudi Arabia, which had given thirty-five million dollars for the construction of the Mosque in Rome, spent hundreds in financing the fighters of Islamic guerilla warfare, encouraging young Muslims from all over the world to engage in the holy war in Europe. The first act of independent Bosnia, which remained mainly a Christian country, was its adhesion to the Organization of The Islamic Conference, that had assembled 57 Islamic countries, united in their aim of propagating the sharī’a all over the world.
Since then, it has appeared clear that Islam has been moving along two strategic lines. The « sweet » line, aimed at the Islamisation of society through the network of mosques, which constitute centres of politcal and religious propaganda – but also military recruitment – like the one in Milan, in Viale Jenner, which served as the operative base for men, money and arms to arrive in Bosnia. The expression of this «Gramscian » expansion is the Muslim Brotherhood, founded by Hasan al-Banna in 1928, a movement, as Magdi Allam refers, that « promoted the Islamisation of society starting from the base, through the control of mosques, Islamic cultural centres, Koranic schools, charitable entities and financial institutes.» (Kamikaze made in Europe, Mondadori, Milano 2005, p. 22).
Alongside this “sweet” strategic line we find, not in opposition, the “Leninist” line of radical Islam which wants to achieve world supremacy through the instruments of war and terrorism. In recent years this hard line has seen the passage from al-Qa’ida to Isis, an Islamic State which extends from the Aleppo peripheries in Syria to those of Baghdad in Iraq, and has as its declared goal, the reconstruction of that universal Caliphate which as the foremost scholar of Islam, Bat Ye’Or, has made clear since the 1990s, is not the dream of the fundamentalists, but the objective of every true Muslim.
Islam’s diverse strategic lines are today converging into the very same global plan of conquest. During his act of establishing the Jihadist Caliphate, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi in a sermon from the Mosque in Mosul, July 4th 2014, called on all Muslims to join him: if they do so – he promised – Islam will arrive even in Rome and will dominate the world. In the video diffused by Isis the black flag of the Caliphate is seen waving on top of the Vatican, the Coliseum is in flames and a sea of blood is submerging it. Lastly, the statement from the Libyan caliphate: “we are south of Rome”, while Abu Muhammed al Adnani, spokesman for the Iraqi Islamic State and Greater Syria, states: “We will occupy your Rome, we will smash your crosses to pieces, we will reduce your women to slavery.”
The same objective has been proclaimed for more than ten years by the main exponent of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Imam, Yusuf al Qaradawi; in a fatwa promulgated on February 27th 2005, he declared that “in the end, Islam will rule and will be lord over the entire world. One of the signs of its victory is that Rome will be conquered, Europe will be occupied, Christians will be defeated and Muslims will increase and become a force that will control the entire European continent.”
Yusuf Qaradawi (who, after having led the Egyptian “Arab springtime” was condemned to death in absentia by the Supreme Court of Cairo, on June 16th of this year) is the President of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, their headquarters being in Dublin, and a point of theological reference to Islamic organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. His ideas diffused through the satellite channel Al Jazeera, influence a large part of contemporary Islam. For the Muslim Brotherhood, as it is for ISIS, the final objective is not Paris or New York, but the city of Rome, center of the only religion, which Islam, since its very birth, has wanted to annihilate. The real enemy is not the United States or the State of Israel, which did not even exist when Islam arrived at the Gates of Vienna in 1683, but the Catholic Church and Christian civilization, to which Muhammad’s religion is a diabolical parody .
Yet, the words used by St. Pius V and Blessed Innocent XI to incite the Holy War that held back the conquering march of Islam at Lepanto and Vienna are not resounding in Rome today. Moreover, if Pope Francis shares the words of the English Prime Minister, David Cameron, according to whom the attacks of June 26th were not in the name of Islam – since Islam is a religion of peace – the battle, on a purely human level, we can say – is lost.
The West’s response to the actions and war proclamations of Islam would seem to be summed up in the hashtag LoveWins, with which the homosexualist lobby flooded Facebook and Twitter. The inversion of values that this message expresses is destined to turn what it asserts upside down: this is no victory, but slavery, the destiny of a world which repudiates its faith and turns the principles of the natural order upside down.
And yet nothing is irreversible in history. Another hashtag would be worth diffusion on the social network – a silent, but overpowering maxim: in hoc Signo vinces, the insignia impressed on Constantine’s banner at Saxa Rubra containing the history of future generations when men correspond to Divine Grace. Help from Heaven is never lacking when men of good will fight so that the Cross of Christ triumphs and reigns in souls and the whole of society. Are there still such men in the West?Source