New Cardinals: Formal Action Against Francis To Protect the Faith – URGENT!

Comment:

Thanks to Lifesitenews for its detailed coverage of this scandal. It’s now long past time for an end to the superficial charity which too many laity, priests and bishops are extending to this appalling pontiff.  It’s long past time for our bishops to speak up, albeit belatedly, to fulfil their role as true shepherds to warn the faithful of the danger to Faith and Morals which this Pope represents. If they continue to fail to do so, then I say the same about them as I said years ago about  Archbishop-then-Cardinal Keith Patrick O’Brien:  to remain silent in the face of such scandal means – has to mean – that they are  compromised in their own personal (probably unrepented sexually active) lives.  That is the only explanation for such spiritual blindness. 

Those with authority in the Church – the hierarchy – MUST speak up, both to warn the faithful and to correct this scandalous pope, who is taking himself to Hell, and countless souls with him.  If our bishops continue in their complicit silence, then, at the risk of repeating myself,  they face a terrible, terrible judgment when they meet God at the moment of death.  

As well as praying very hard – especially and always for the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary – we need to do whatever we can, personally to alert our own bishop to the need to act.  Search online for your own diocesan bishop’s contact details and write/email him to express your shock as well as your expectation that he will do something.  If nothing else, you can give him the link to this thread, pointing out that you are not alone in your concern; we have readers and commentators here from across Scotland and the wider UK  but also from various other parts of the world.

Nobody, no lay person, priest or bishop, is exempt from our Confirmation duty to defend the Faith under attack, whether from “foreign or domestic terrorists” – that is, whether from outside the Church or inside – and especially when the attacker, the evil-doer, is the Pope himself.  

33 responses

  1. The factual information given in video is a strong, strong reason why these men should not be appointed Cardinals. Francis, yet again, shows by his actions, a desire to please the world and the flesh. His action in appointing them is to the detriment of Mother Church, Jesus Christ’s body on earth, whom Francis is “supposed” to be leading and guarding in his pontificate.

    I am reminded of the renouncement pilgrims to Lough Derg in Eire, St Patrick’s Purgatory, have to make at St Brigid’s cross, towards the beginning of the stations made:
    “I renounce the world, the flesh and the devil.” said 3 times.

    Cardinals, Bishops and priests have to be far stronger in living this in their lives for the sake of the flock.

    Pray, pray, pray for Francis, and for such, because actions such as this, are not of God, not inspired by the Holy Ghost.

    Lord Jesus, Have mercy on your Church.

    • OLG,

      Well said – St Paul tells us that “God will not be mocked” so it can’t, surely, be too much longer before He acts to cleanse the hierarchy, removing the “filth” of which Pope Benedict spoke.

  2. The raising of Wilton Gregory to the Cardinalate at this time is particulraly telling for me. He was the prelate remember who represented the face of Socialism when he publicly and disgracefully condemned President Trump for visiting the John Paul II shrine. He’s also pro-homosexual and pro-Communion for the divorced and remarried.

    To to give the Cardinal’s hat to this Washington apostate during the last week of an election, given the Socialist attacks this Pope has already made indirectly on Trump, the most recent in Fratelli Tutti, indicates a Pope who is driven by ideology rather than the spirit of Our Lord. In fact the Wilton Gregory appointment is so in-your-face “never Trump” as to indicate no little malice on the part of this Successor of St. Peter.

    He is an absolutely scandalous Pope and I just wonder how many more outrages he will be allowed to get away with before the spineless prelates of the Church stand up and challenge him publicly. Shocking times indeed. Who would ever have believed that such a man would end up on the Chair of St. Peter, disgracing the Church now for more than 7 years?

    • What we have known of this Man who would be called Pope Jorge Bergoglio now cannot be hidden. Is the Man a Catholic. Was he ever really of The Catholic Faith. Doubtful. Is he and has he always been for Years A Marxist.
      Most Definitely.

        • Athanasius,

          That is truly shocking. I wouldn’t apologise for posting it here – that fits on just about any thread because it is manifest evidence of the devil “going about seeking the ruin of souls” and is due almost solely to the scandalous apostate clergy and hierarchy in the contemporary Church.

          Indeed, if it fits on any thread, it definitely fits on here, where the appointment of the likes of Wilton Gregory among the new cardinals, is nothing if not demonic.

        • Athanasius,

          I hope the SSPX in Australia holds a Eucharistic Procession and Mass in reparation for this. That is what they did when this happened in Oklahoma, while the local bishop, true to Novus Ordo form, merely advised his flock to “ignore” the satanists.

          I don’t know which is the worse scandal: the black mass itself, or the bishop’s failure to respond.

    • Athanasius,

      Very minor typos – now corrected. Worry not, that is easy for me to fix when I see them.

      Totally agree with you about the need for the spineless prelates to stand up and challenge Pope Francis publicly.

      The really disturbing thing is, though, that many of them are too young to have been taught the Faith properly themselves. Take Bishop Keenan of Paisley, for example, who said, on his appointment, that he planned to bring Pope Francis’s vision of the Church to his diocese. God help us all.

      From what I’m hearing, he seems to be succeeding…

    • Athanasius,

      Thank you for posting that here as well as on the other Francis thread. It bears repeating that his shocking support for civil unions cannot be waved away as being a mistranslation. That is very important to know, so thank you for that.

      • Ed up at an early hour and thought about earlier thread . One of the things that I actually had an argument with my Brother yesterday was that as far as I could read of this Homosexual Garbage from this Pope was that He wished for Families from Homosexual Unions which really opens up all kinds of Evil . ( By the way I am no Saint and I need to get my own Conscience Cleaned up and soon ) . But the way that I read into this is that Francis wants in his Promoting Homosexuality ,Children from a Homosexual Union that would either be so called Test Tube Babies or Surrogate ones . I also am sorry to deviate but I haven’t read anything along these lines and would like your opinion. Also as far as these Apostates of whom he has Elevated as Princes to Our Catholic Church is just him really on a role . On a lighter note I nearly put down Princesses ?

          • Thanks for the reply those were as I suspect ( I V F ) especially for the Rich Homosexuals in the United States at least for the time being the way to aquire their own Children. Of course if Biden and Harris get in The Little Sisters of The Poor would probably be forced to pay . As on a really terrible and more serious note ( I cannot find the Article) About 3 years back 2 Rich Homosexuals in the U.K.ORDERED a Child from the U.S.A. They stipulated ( Wait For it ) a Male Child with Green Eyes and Straight Hair. Now the Baby did have Green Eyes but when his hair started to grow it Curled Slightly. And now for the really Horrific Part . The 2 Reprobate Homosexuals wanted to send the Child back . How sick is that . I never ever read any follow up stories on this I V F tragedy but it really goes to show that Homosexuals only want ( God Forgive Me ) a Pet .

            • Faith of our Fathers,

              Straight hair? That’s bizarre. I wonder what they were thinking of. As you say, it’s a pet they are wanting not a child to love and raise. What times we are living in.

            • Faith of Our Fathers,

              “Straight” hair? For homosexuals? How ironically incongruous, he said, with tongue in cheek….

              • Your spot on there Sir . I actually never thought of that at the time . Really when do they ever want something Straight it’s all usually —–well you know what .

  3. Even the Protestant evangelicals are up in arms about this Pope:

    https://gospelnewsnetwork.org/2020/10/27/franklin-graham-evangelicals-condemn-pope-francis-support-for-gay-civil-unions/

    “Up in arms,” btw, seems to be an attitude completely alien to the Catholic hierarchy – that is, those in the hierarchy who are not currying favor with their dictator boss. “Up in arms” would imply that there is a Church Militant, but instead we have a Church Effeminate.

    But true to his hubris, Francis will not “permanently change the Church” as he thinks he can. He can only place himself, and his sycophants, ever closer to perdition. May it please God that he takes as few souls with him as possible.

    • RCA Victor,

      Goodness! What shame, utter shame, this pontiff has brought down on Christ’s Church. To read those words from the keyboard of a Protestant Evangelical is sobering indeed.

      As for a “Church Effeminate” – I fear you are correct. Hence the loud silence from what appears to me to be an entire hierarchy which is sexually compromised. There really IS no other explanation.

      • Ed there is no doubt now for anyone who can see that Francis wants and is Promoting an Effeminate Church. I am now well on in Life and I Personally have never seen a sign above any Catholic Church which says Homosexuals Not Allowed. Also and it has been discussed but Privately which way does Francis Lean . He is most certainly a Marxist but is he a Queer Marxist. These questions now have to be asked by the Few Good Men still around The Higherarchy of Our Catholic Church.

      • Editor,

        What shame, utter shame, this pontiff has brought down on Christ’s Church.

        That reminds me of one of the Holy Face prayers:

        “Eternal Father, I offer Thee the Holy Face of Jesus, covered with blood, sweat, dust, spittle and shame, in reparation for the crimes of Communists, blasphemers, and for the profaners of the Holy Name and the Holy Day of Sunday.”

        (Some versions leave out the word “shame”)

  4. RCAVictor

    We have all heard Catholics being asked if they think they’re more Catholic than the Pope, but when even the Protestants are evidently more Catholic than the Pope we know there’s a serious problem with the Chair of Peter right now. What this Pope is trying to sell as Catholicism beggars belief, as does the overall silence of that effeminate hierarchy. Just incredible!

  5. It’s just too much to take in, appointing new cardinals who really do hate the teaching of the Church and Christ. The teaching on homosexuality is Scripture based so these bishops and new cardinals obviously don’t believe in the truth of Scripture. Why should they when the pope doesn’t!

  6. “Rome has lost the faith, my dear friends. Rome is in apostasy. These are not words, these are not empty words that I am telling you, it is true. Rome is in apostasy. You can’t trust that world anymore; they have left the church, they left the church. They are leaving the Church. It is sure, sure, sure.”
    Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, September 4, 1987.

    How prophetic the saintly Archbishop was … and what words he would have for today!

    • Andrew Magoffin,

      We can certainly hope that Archbishop Lefebvre would be speaking out today about this disgraceful pontiff, including these new cardinals. I believe he would. Whether he would speak out about the lockdown and restrictions we will never know – although again, I sincerely hope he would. What we do know is that those in his place today, those in charge of the SSPX are remaining curiously silent on all fronts, even complying with the Government interference in the Church. The clergy across the board – traditional as well as modernist – are, to a greater or larger extent, for the most part, complying with Government restrictions. This is hugely disappointing.

      There were a couple of brave SSPX priests in the USA who challenged the restrictions in court and won their case but, that apart, the clergy everywhere are at least compliant if not zealous like the dreadful “priest-policemen” reported in various places on this thread – those actively enforcing the wearing of masks, for example, and threatening the refusal of the sacraments to laity who refuse to conform.

  7. The photograph of Pope Benedict handing over the large box of his Papal Investigation’s findings into the serious corruption within members of the hierarchy to the new Pope (Francis) seems to have been forgotten. Pope Francis was the more healthy of the two and was to clean house. Instead, Pope Francis appears to have used the information in the box to make his appointments.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: