Call For Lawyer’s Prosecution Over Killing Fox – Killing Babies Still OK… 

Comment:

Such outrage over the killing of a fox – hardly the most friendly animal in the world. Whatever, I’m always astounded that the same people who are against cruelty to animals (and I would certainly not condone such cruelty) do not extend their outrage to the murder of innocent human beings in their mother’s womb. Not if “mummy” doesn’t want him/her – “mummy” has to have the right to choose to kill that little baby, but, as we can see, try using the right to choose argument to kill a fox, and you’re likely to end up in court. I wonder what would be the outcome if everyone demanding this lawyer’s head, were to watch an actual abortion or the “products” of an abortion lying in a dish, easily identifiable as a boy or girl (although not any of the other 99 genders – I’ll concede that…)

A suggestion for the Petition-signers:  pay a visit to this site to challenge your  (propaganda-based) beliefs about abortion, and then come back to argue for the prosecution of all those involved in THOSE killings. I won’t be holding my breath…  

20 responses

  1. WISHING EVERYONE A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR
    Thank you Patricia for this important post
    In this ever crazy mixed up World we get Foxes,Newts ,Bats ,Rare species of Flowers taking precedence over our own precious species pre born children in fact every year gets more pro death I like Animals and would not hurt them BUT there has to be a line drawn ……..groups of Uni Students would severely abuse and possibly assault you if you sell meat or fish yet they will happily with their deluded selves scream obscenities and make disgusting placards crudely out of cardboard and make vile disgusting womb like toys and coat hangers dripping in blood bay for even more infant bloodlust utterly tragic

    • Wendy,

      Yes, it is a sure sign of the diabolical that these “pro-choice” people only want to choose to kill human babies, not insects or animals, which must be protected, at all costs. Even a plea of insanity doesn’t cover the evil in which they are participating.

  2. All perfect points from you Catholic Truth and Wendy. Yet, nothing truthful sinks into the consciousness of those who perform and condone the gross and unholy murders of babies. They don’t realize the horror they are into! Why don’t they feel bad when they SEE a broken little baby in front of their eyes? When they see its’ blood on their rubber gloves and staining their white surgical gown (if they even wear one) or when they first pick up a scalpel to make the first ‘incision’ WHAT IS WRONG WITH THEM?
    Why does the blood of the destroyed fox body bother them so?

    • Mary Anne,

      I’ll never forget the video clip showing the doctor at Planned Parenthood poking around the “products” of an aborted child in a small silver dish and saying “Oops! Another boy!”

      Talk about a dead conscience.

      • And that same ‘Doctor’ will change his bloody scrub suit into an expensive business suit with a white coat over all, and go visit his patient in labor at the City hospital in the Labor and Delivery unit, and order something for her pain. She will never know what he just did by his smile and compassionate words. Same mentality as the one who loves foxes …. more than little babies. God help us all!

    • Mary Anne,

      “Why does the blood of the destroyed fox body bother them so?”

      That’s what makes me think it’s absolutely from the Devil – truly diabolical – to want to kill babies in the womb and not feel any guilt at all, let alone compassion for the agony inflicted on the child.

  3. I have noticed this a lot – the snowflakes lose control and burst into tears at the very thought of cruelty to animals but don’t want to know about the killing of unborn babies, sanctioned by the State. It’s incomprehensible to me. I wish I knew how to hit the spot that would make them right-thinking about abortion.

    That lawyer should be prosecuted though but not for the fox business – he’s the lawyer who went to court to try “stop Brexit”. I’d like to see him in jail for that, LOL!

  4. I think the false theory of evolution is partly to blame for this – the idea that man is descended from beasts really makes him just another variety of beast. However, in that case, you would think that compassion for non-human beasts would apply also to the infants of the human “beast.”

    Perhaps the inability to face the truth, or even to hate the truth, would explain the rest of this infanticide bestiality.

    I’ve also noticed that the pro-abortion crowd is rife with lesbians, who don’t get pregnant anyway, so “inability to face the truth” comes with the territory. Truth, to these people, is in fact a hate crime.

    • RCA Victor,

      Your remark about lesbians, reminds me of the pro-abortionists suggesting somewhere some time ago, that we should not refer to an expectant mother using the term “mother” – instead, say “pregnant person”. They’re a bunch of idiots, the lot of them.

      • Ed,

        I did a first aid course in March and we were told that in the event we have to deal with an emergency childbirth, we should avoid using the term ‘mother’ or feminine pronouns. An older gent doing the course used unparliamentary language when he heard this.

    • RCA Victor,

      ” the pro-abortion crowd is rife with lesbians, who don’t get pregnant anyway,”

      I think that is a lot to do with this evil – it’s unnatural behaviours admixed. It’s not natural for two women to engage in simulated sexual activity and it’s unnatural for a mother to want to kill her child, at any stage in his or her life.

      That’s one reason why so many of the pro-abortionists are so determined to legalise abortion right up to birth.

  5. I also think the internal enemies of the Church laid the foundation for this in the Vatican II document Gaudium et Spes when, regarding the two ends of marriage, they placed the procreation of children essentially on the same footing as the unitive aspect.

    They thus broke with Tradition, gravely weakened the primary end of marriage, and set the stage for children being unwanted and disposable objects. I think this cunning, insidious move even set the stage for the normalization of homosexuality and “homosexual marriage.”

    It’s all about “love” now (according to the minions of Satan, that is – it’s actually all about malice and hate). They knew exactly what they were doing.

    • RCA Victor,

      I hadn’t thought of that – changing the ends of marriage was indeed a cunning move, and it’s routine now to hear people saying that marriage is for the two people to share their lives etc. Children are hardly ever mentioned and even when a couple of years have passed I know I still avoid mentioning the possible arrival of a baby. It’s so obvious that children are now optional extras for too many married couples (that is if they bother to get married at all and now they have extended civil partnerships to couples who are not homosexual. The whole thing is mad.)

    • I’m not as knowledgeable as you but isn’t the unitive aspect both spiritual (sacamental) and physical (intercourse), with the fruit of the latter being children?

      • CatholicConvert1,

        (I’m not nearly as knowledgeable as you think, but thank you for the compliment).

        I think you’re missing the point. The point is not in what spirit children are conceived – which, as you suggest, should be in a spiritual framework, rather than in a spirit of fornication. The point is this: what is the primary end of marriage?

        The Church has always taught, until Vatican II, that the procreation and education of children is the primary end of marriage (presumably and hopefully, procreation within the spiritual framework). Vatican Ii turned that on its head and placed spousal love, whether procreation occurred or not, on the same footing as procreation.

        This move, as I’ve suggested above, opened a Pandora’s Box of both infanticide and homosexual “marriage,” though it took a generation (pun intended) for the evil fruits of this change to fully develop.

  6. I hope that he is prosecuted. Animal cruelty, be it fox hunting, bull fighting or badger culling etc is wrong. Obviously, it doesn’t compare to abortion, but needless to say if you kill an animal for no good reason, i.e. self defence, you deserve locking up.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: